The property was built in 1940, making it 84 years old. While the description notes that the 'owner replaced roofs and sewers' and the 'property recently passed city inspection,' indicating essential maintenance and functionality, there are no interior images provided. Without visual confirmation of the kitchen, bathrooms, flooring, appliances, or other interior features, it's impossible to assess their current condition, style, or modernity. Given the age of the property and the lack of explicit mention of recent extensive interior renovations, it is highly probable that the interior components, especially the kitchen and bathrooms, are outdated and would require significant updates to meet current quality standards and buyer expectations. The property is 'fully rented,' suggesting it is habitable, but this does not imply modern aesthetics or features. The primary value proposition appears to be the development opportunity of the C2 zoned lot, rather than the condition of the existing structures. Therefore, it falls into the 'Fair' category, as it is aged but maintained enough to be functional, yet likely requires substantial cosmetic and functional updates internally.